Google translator

Wednesday, February 17, 2010

How precious...


UNION MENTALITY

By 
Neal Boortz 
February 17, 2010 8:36 AM 
Permalink | Comments (0) TrackBacks (0)
John Stossel pointed out this quote from a union official in New York. It really highlights the essence of union mentality, particularly the ever-growing government union mentality.
Albany Police Officers Union President Chris Mesley says that, regardless of the faltering economy, a no-raise new contract is unacceptable.
And to hell with the public.
"I'm not running a popularity contest here," Mesley said. "If I'm the bad guy to the average citizen . . . and their taxes have go up to cover my raise, I'm very sorry about that, but I have to look out for myself and my membership."
Mesley added: "As the president of the local, I will not accept 'zeroes.' If that means . . . ticking off some taxpayers, then so be it."
Do you remember what I told you yesterday? I shamelessly stole material from a Minneapolis Star-Tribune opinion piece to explain the difference between government and private-sector unions. Here's your rehash:
Private Sector Unions
Union members know that if their demands are unreasonable they could cause the financial collapse of their employer. Managers know that if they give too much to the unions the business may not survive. Each side has a survival instinct to address.
Government Employee Unions
Union members know that no matter what sort of grand contract they negotiate, their employer, the government, will be able to pay the tab. This is because government doesn't have to make a profit to operate. Government only needs the power to seize money from the taxpayers. Likewise, government leaders know that they can give the unions almost any concession because of their ability to seize the needed funds through taxation. There's one more advantage for government employee unions: They participate in the process of choosing the very politicians they're going to negotiate for more wages and benefits. Sweeeeeeet.

Han har förstått...

http://www.expressen.se/kronikorer/ulfnilson/1.1883888/ulf-nilson-en-papperstidning-maste-avsloja-fordjupa-och-forbattra

Tuesday, February 9, 2010

Teacher Claims He Was Fired After Complaining Muslim Pupils Called 9/11 Hijackers 'Heroes' - International News | News of the World | Middle East News | Europe News - FOXNews.com

Teacher Claims He Was Fired After Complaining Muslim Pupils Called 9/11 Hijackers 'Heroes' - International News | News of the World | Middle East News | Europe News - FOXNews.com

Posted using ShareThis

FairTax


THE VAT IS BACK

By 
Neal Boortz 
February 9, 2010 8:45 AM 
Permalink | Comments (0) TrackBacks (0)
CNNMoney.com has posted an opinion piece, originally in Fortune Magazine, that should scare the fire out of you. The piece is entitled: VAT Trap: The inevitable fix for the deficit. Here's an excerpt:
The gigantic deficits the Administration is projecting are appalling, and they provide a chilling look at our future: America is hurtling towards a fiscal trap that is forcing us into the only option we'll have to restore budgetary sanity: A Value-Added Tax.
Unfortunately, no one really wants to address it. Nancy Pelosi has spoken admiringly of a VAT, and on the Right, former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee wants the levy to replace the income tax. But so far, it's mainly a favorite of a cadre of economists at universities and think tanks. White House budget chief Peter Orszag recently dismissed it as an idea that's "popular with academics but not seriously considered by policy makers."
But it's never gotten much support in the U.S. for two reasons. First, it's a regressive tax: Low-earning families pay a bigger portion of their incomes than the wealthy. And second, the VAT -- first introduced by a French civil servant in 1954 -- has fueled the rapid growth of government in France, Germany, and even Japan. In fact, no other country spends the kind of money we're planning to spend without a VAT.
First of all ... Mike Huckabee is NOT pushing a VAT. He is a proponent of the FairTax. You would expect the reporters to know that .. but then again, it takes actual research.
The trouble here is that the political class may well manage to implement a VAT ... mainly because most Americans still don't know of and understand the FairTax. Trust me, there are plans afoot to change that. More on that next week.
http://boortz.com/nealz_nuze/2010/02/the-vat-is-back.html#add_comment

Global warming collapse...

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/opinions/the-great-global-warming-collapse/article1458206/
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/RFK-79834057.html
AND!!!
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1250872/Climategate-U-turn-Astonishment-scientist-centre-global-warming-email-row-admits-data-organised.html#ixzz0fWrHldg3
and some more
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703630404575053781465774008.html

Sunday, January 31, 2010

800 mil to feed 2 mil people in Haiti??!!

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704878904575031673153590414.html
"On Thursday, the United Nations' World Food Program appealed to governments for more cash for Haiti supplies: $800 million to feed two million people through December, more than quadruple the $196 million already pledged."

Thursday, January 21, 2010

Gert Wilders

http://barenakedislam.wordpress.com/2010/01/20/geert-wilders-the-most-popular-politician-in-the-netherlands-goes-on-trial-for-insulting-islam/#comments

Good one!

http://www.markshannon.com/republicandemocrat.htm

Although Libertarians are missing here.....

Which Do You Believe?

Republicans believe...
Democrats believe...
...that the United States were founded on the fundamental principle that individuals have certain rights and freedoms which cannot be infringed upon and may be restricted only to the degree necessary to preserve the rights of others.
...that our Founding Fathers did not really mean what they said when they guaranteed certain constitutional rights such as the right to freedom of religious expression, the right to keep and bear arms, and the right to retain the use of private property.
...the money you earn is yours and that government in a free society has the right to take only as much as is needed to perform those limited functions, which are appropriate to it.
...government has a right to use your money as it sees fit to redistribute wealth, establish new spending programs in times of budget surpluses, and to return to you only that portion of your money which is politically expedient.
...the traditional family and the values it fosters are the foundation of American society and their preservation is essential to our Nation's continued success.
...American society must redefine its values and the role of the family to fit new lifestyle concepts, which have resulted from the 60ís counter-culture movement and an attitude that promotes an abrogation of individual responsibility.
...parents have the right to determine the values with which their children will be raised and to have the widest possible choice among public, private and religious schools and that competition will improve public education.
...the federal government has the right to determine the values which will be taught in public schools and parentsí choice of schools must be limited to avoid exposing public schools to competitive forces which would encourage reform and increase accountability.
...that the free enterprise system is the most effective engine of economic progress.
...that government regulation and federal control of economic activity can better distribute wealth and services to the American people.
...high taxes, runaway government spending, and over-regulation of business and farming punish initiative and stifle economic growth.
...penalizing achievement with higher taxes and increased government bureaucracy and spending will not stifle economic growth but instead guarantee prosperity for everyone.
...that with freedom comes responsibility and that individuals must take personal responsibility for their own actions and our criminal justice system must be based on this idea.
...individual behavior, including criminal behavior, can be blamed on "society" and that spending on social welfare programs and improvements in prison living conditions can combat crime.
...that your property is yours and you have the basic right to make use of it without unreasonable government restrictions.
...the government has the right to regulate the use of private property in accordance with narrow special interests without giving just compensation to owners.
...the preservation of our rights and freedoms must be entrusted to a strong national defense and of the ability of the United States to negotiate with other nations from a position of strength.
...we can afford to drastically weaken our military despite the threats present in an unstable, post-Cold War international environment and the United States must subjugate its interests to those of the United Nations.
...it is imperative today to re-affirm the traditional freedoms and values of America to preserve our great Republic.
...that America must adopt a politically correct, multi-cultural set of values which denies common American heritage and will further divide American society.
...there can be differences of opinion and that such differences such result in opponents, not enemies.
...that all whom oppose them are to be treated as enemies.
...that all of America's citizens can enjoy the rights and freedoms of our country without diminishing the rights of others.
...that some must give up a portion of their rights and freedoms that others may enjoy those same rights and freedoms.
...that public servants, particularly those whom we elect to office, must be held accountable to the highest standards of ethical conduct. "If a man cannot be trusted with the government of himself, can he be trusted with the government of others?" [Thomas Jefferson] 
...that loyalty to a discredited leader is a virtue and if other office holders have committed indiscretions, a sitting office holder should not be criticized for failing to uphold the highest standards of ethical conduct.

Thursday, January 14, 2010

But of course....

http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=11108
The Democrat healthcare plans promise higher taxes for low-income wage earners and therefore higher premium costs.

Friday, January 8, 2010

Wife 'proud' of CIA bomber

Wife 'proud' of CIA bomber
"The Turkish wife of the Jordanian suicide bomber who killed seven CIAagents in Afghanistan expressed pride on Thursday in what he had done.

"I am proud of my husband. He carried out a great operation in this war. I hope Allah will accept his martyrdom, if he has become a martyr,"Defne Bayrak told reporters in Istanbul, where she lives."

Hmmm.... Turkish wife, Jordanian bomber p-ssed off about Afghanistan... so, the mussies are all in it together.

Old stuff recycled today

Old communist tactics used today by Dems and muslims...


Communist Party directive issued in 1943:

"Members and front organizations must continually embarrass,
discredit and degrade our critics.... When obstructionists
become too irritating, label them as fascist or Nazi or
anti-Semitic.... Constantly associate those who oppose us
with those names that already have a bad smell.
The association will, after enough repetition, become
"fact" in the public mind."

1956 Report of the House
Committee on Un-American Activities (volume 1, page 347)

Thursday, December 31, 2009

Barking up the wrong tree!!

http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/12/dhs-threatens-blogger/
How stupid is this??!! Why not look for the real threat?
#98.... ie the muslim terrorists!! For crying out loud!

Wednesday, December 16, 2009

The ever loving "debate" on the climate......"change"....

http://www.dailyexpress.co.uk/posts/view/146138

More about the fantastic expensive healthcare reform we can look forward to!

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/58533

What the Health Care Bill Means for You | David Drucker and Michael D. Tanner | Cato Institute: Commentary

What the Health Care Bill Means for You | David Drucker and Michael D. Tanner | Cato Institute: Commentary

Posted using ShareThis

Why government healthcare isn't the answer!

http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/starner.asp

IT'S A CULTURE CRISIS, NOT A HEALTHCARE CRISIS

By 
Neal Boortz 
December 16, 2009 8:16 AM 
Permalink | Comments (4) TrackBacks (0)
A listener sent me this letter to the editor that appeared in a Jackson, Mississippi newspaper. We have confirmed, via Snopes, that the letter is true. It's a quick read, but it gets right to the point.
Dear Sirs:

"During my last night's shift in the ER, I had the pleasure of evaluating a patient with an expensive shiny gold tooth, multiple elaborate expensive tattoos, a very expensive brand of tennis shoes and a new cellular telephone equipped with her favorite R&B tune for a ringtone.. Glancing over the chart, one could not help noticing her payer status: Medicaid. She smokes more than one costly pack of cigarettes every day and, somehow, still has money to buy beer.

And our Congress expects me to pay for this woman's healthcare? Our nation's healthcare crisis is not a shortage of quality hospitals, doctors or nurses. It is a crisis of culture ˜ a culture in which it is perfectly acceptable to spend money on vices while refusing to take care of one's self or, heaven forbid, purchase health insurance. A culture that thinks "I can do whatever I want to because someone else will always take care of me". Life is really not that hard. Most of us reap what we sow. Don't you agree?

STARNER JONES, MD
Jackson, MS

Hey, Dr. Jones. Soon you will be working for the government and it will be all good.

Friday, December 4, 2009

Rasism

http://www.newsmill.se/artikel/2009/12/03/saklig-debatt-om-islam-ar-inte-rasism

RUBEN AGNARSSON OM DEMOKRATI OCH ISLAM

Saklig debatt om islam är inte rasism

OM FÖRFATTAREN:

VD och ansvarig utgivare för Världen idag. Tidningen har publicerat ett antal artiklar om hur det står till med de mänskliga rättigheterna i länder som domineras av islam.
Här följer ett litet axplock av citat från regeringens officiella hemsida om länder där islam har en dominerande ställning:
Saudiarabien: "Situationen för mänskliga rättigheter och för demokrati i Saudiarabien har betydande brister... Församlings- eller religionsfrihet existerar inte... Fackföreningar är inte tillåtna och inte heller finns någon strejkrätt... Den egna tolkningen av den islamiska lagen, sharia, som baseras på Koranen och tolkningarna av Koranen, tar som regel över annan lagstiftning. Offentliga avrättningar och kroppsstraff förekommer. Under 2007 avrättades fler personer än någonsin förr."
Jemen: "Islam är statsreligion och i stort sett alla medborgare är muslimer... Konstitutionen föreskriver religionsfrihet, men konvertering från islam är strikt förbjuden och är belagd med dödsstraff."
Iran (21 sidor): "Kränkningarna av de mänskliga rättigheterna i Iran är omfattande och förefaller öka. En klar försämring har skett de senaste åren, särskilt vad beträffar yttrandefrihet, verkställande av dödsstraff, ökad förföljelse av intellektuella, studenter och oliktänkande samt tortyr i fängelser. Irans etniska och religiösa minoriteter fortsätter att diskrimineras. Landet lever inte upp till kraven på en rättsstat.  I många fall baseras domarna på sharia-lagarna och fatwas från ledande religiösa uttolkare av Koranen vilket skapar inkonsekvens, osäkerhet och sammanblandning av rättskällor."
Qatar: "Att konvertera från islam är formellt belagt med dödsstraff."
Syrien: "Shariarätten verkar diskriminerande mot kvinnor på en rad områden. Det går dock bra för en person att konvertera till islam men inte tvärtom."
Tunisien: "Islam är statsreligion. Landets stormufti, det vill säga den högste rättslärde och uttolkaren av lagen, utses av presidenten. Presidenten måste enligt författningen vara muslim... Ingen systematisk värvning till andra religioner än islam får förekomma."
Malaysia: "Islam är statsreligion men det står icke-muslimer fritt att utöva andra religioner... Det är i praktiken omöjligt för en muslim att byta religion... Icke-muslimer får inte aktivt verka för att omvända muslimer. Muslimer får dock verka för omvändelse till islam bland icke-muslimer. Det händer att shariadomstolar förklarar en person för "avfälling". För detta kan personen dömas till rehabilitering och böter. Men det innebär inte
automatiskt att personen därmed förklaras vara icke-muslim."
Bangladesh: "Islam är statsreligion, men konstitutionen garanterar religionsfrihet. Islam spelar en dominerande roll i samhället och statsmakterna är känsliga i frågor som skulle kunna uppröra landets muslimska majoritet... Förföljelser av religiösa minoriteter förekommer."
Pakistan: "Situationen för de mänskliga rättigheterna i Pakistan har förvärrats under 2007. Liksom tidigare är bristande rättssäkerhet, godtycklig myndighetsutövning och diskriminering av kvinnor och minoriteter vanligt förekommande i det pakistanska samhället. Tortyr förekommer och dödsstraff tillämpas... Kristna pakistanier diskrimineras ofta på arbetsmarknaden och lever ofta under svåra förhållanden... Ett godtyckligt och informellt system av rättskipning baserad på islamisk rätt och stamtraditioner tillämpas i de olika stamområdena."
Exemplen kan mångfaldigas.
Att en kristen forskare som Kristian Steiner blundar för det uppenbara förtrycket av kristna minoriteter i islam-dominerade länder kan tyckas förvånande. Men han är inte ensom om att se mellan fingrarna när det gäller frånvaron av demokrati, religionsfrihet, kvinnors rättigheter och yttrandefrihet i länder som domineras av islam. Även vänsterpolitiker och feminister tycks bara beredda till samma sak.
Devrim Mavi, redaktionsmedlem i Dagens Arena, skrev i april i år om det faktum att vänstern i västvärlden valt att närma sig islamister:
"Det är dags för vänstern att börja bevärdiga muslimer med samma krav som ställs på ickemuslimer. Det går inte att vara feminist i Sverige men förhandla bort feminismen när det kommer till Hamas för att de kallar sig för och blir betraktade av många som en befrielserörelse."
När försvaret av mänskliga rättigheter i muslimska länder beskrivs som islamofobi, och när de som framför kritik mot islam framställs som Sverigedemokrater, gynnas enbart högerpopulismen.
Den undfallenhet som delar av det politiska etablissemanget uppvisar gentemot islam, spelar enbart Sverigedemokraterna (SD) i händerna, vilket är djupt tragiskt. Det går självklart alldeles utmärkt att ha en kritisk inställning till islams ideologi och samtidigt förespråka en human svensk flyktingpolitik och hävda muslimers rätt att inte bli diskriminerade i det svenska samhället.